India and Pakistan will have to negotiate for the future towards the future
News Time
This fact is tempted what factors are needed for the development and prosperity of all the areas of any nation, one of them is the main and most important act of peace, the inner country and the borders too. Not only do the local economic activities affect peace, but also on negative capitalism and bilateral projects have negative effects. Pakistan’s tragedy was that he had to fight his survival war from the beginning. India not only stopped the assets of Pakistan, but also crushed the slogan of Kashmiris, occupying a fortunate gun on Kashmir, and also invaded the war on Pakistan. It would not be amazed to say that India’s self-sufficiency of hostility has stopped the path of prosperity and prosperity of both the countries, and the number of people living below the crisis could not have been so much. Pakistan has always been in the position to resolve disputes with mutual dialogue. Prime Minister Pakistan Imran Khan also criticized the same position in his Twitter message on Tuesday India and Pakistan will have to negotiate for future advancement and all settlements including Kashmir will have to solve the issue of demanding issues. The easiest version of poverty eradication and improvement of the lives of the people of the subcontinent is a matter of dialogue with the solution of problems and mutual trade.
Remember that Modi Government was very warmly welcomed after the confidence of Imran Khan’s prime minister’s position to be fed. And the expansion of a new era of friendly relations was expected. How serious it is about Pakistan’s peaceful disarmament can be estimated by this after his election success, Imran Khan said in his speech squad to improve mutual relations. If one steps ahead, India will move two steps forward. Imran Khan said on the criticism of Indian cricketer Novjit Singh Sadoo on participation in the oath-taking ceremony of Imran Khan’s ministry. That he came to be a peace maker. Those who take the sword are actually invading the peace of the subcontinent.
Earlier, Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said that Pakistan and India need a continuous and uninterrupted dialogue. Both nuclear forces have no other way to negotiate. It is not possible to be aware of the fact that if Pakistan and India were rather supported rather than being sincere, the situation in the region would not have been that which is now. Both countries focus their attention on the welfare of the people, which are forced to live in both the countries. If the situation worsens after four wars, does not it make sense that the war produces problems, it is not the solution. The 1948 emphasis was overwhelmed by the UN intervention, the 65-year-old deal was tied to Tashkent, and the case of 71 also kept on American intervention and Kargal’s fight. After all the financial losses and financial losses had to come on the negotiation table so it is not better to give the world evidence of being decent and conscious by solving problems without interrupting any arbitrator.
Take an example of the European Union, which has been a mutual interpreter for a period of time, but finally it concluded that its survival and development are in peace, not in war. Pakistan and India now have to forget the past turtles and try to endure peace in the region so their efforts will make them sincerely sincere to their people. Both governments should keep in mind that such efforts have been destroyed by the peaceful enemies; they will have to be tracked. Continuous and non-interrupted negotiations are the only solution in this regard.
