The hearing of the Panama execution case was completed
Islamabad … News Time
The hearing of the Panama execution case has been completed on the JIT report in the Supreme Court; the court has reserved the case of the case, which will be given later. Justice Azmat Saeed gave remarks that he would guarantee that the prime minister’s discomfort will be reviewed. Justice Ejaz Afzal said that already looking at the matter of discomfort. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that the decision was taken, will not withdraw from its decision. The main progress has been done during the fifth hearing of the case today; the Supreme Court has opened the report on May 10. Justice Azmat Saeed said that no one will show it soon, and more than 10 things will become clear. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan gave remarks that why the Prime Minister gave his mysterious evidence to the National Assembly why he is not giving us? Did Prime Minister also include himself in our asset? If you have to swim against the waves while living in the scope of the law, you will swim the main rights of the defendants, the constitution and the law will not go out. Justice Ejaz Afzal gave remarks that the matter here is of the public designer, he is responsible for his post.
During the hearing, Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that the articles of the Constitution are in front of our views, will not make any decision, which will lead to anybody’s basic constitutional rights. Justice Azeaz Afzal Khan, Justice Azmat Saeed and Justice Ejaz Al-Hassan, headed by Justice Ejaz Khan, after hearing a joint investigation team (JIT) report, has been constantly hearing the fifth case today. Is
In which Prime Minister’s children’s lawyer Salman Akram Raja completed his arguments, while Tariq Hassan, lawyer of Ishaq Dar, also argued for the second time.
Addressing the prime minister’s lawyer, Justice Azmat said that Khawaja is opening this tenth in your request; no one will show tenth to anyone right now.
Khawaja Harris said that the court has the privilege to show anyone.
The remarks made by Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that the public designer had addressed the National Assembly and the nation, addressing that there is evidence of children’s business, we have been waiting for these proofs for a year, in the report Mary It has been said to be a beneficial owner, to be the beneficial owner of Maryam’s companies, not appearing in Captain Safdar’s scores, the court has concluded that public representation act will not be applicable to the property.
Salman Akram Raja, Prime Minister’s children’s lawyer said that yesterday’s hearing was discussed on the Nelson and Nassol Trust Trust,
The court said it was a case of fraudulence in the case, and I said yesterday that it would be explained. Salman Akram Raja said that there was no intention of giving false documents in any case, it was just a clerk error, came from Akram Sheikh’s Chamber. The second case is confirmation of the holiday on holiday, this is a routine work in London, and notification is confirmed on holiday.
Justice Azmat said that Sisalester is also available on weekdays.
Salman Akram Raja argued that the resources for the children were given to their grandparents, till year 2004; they kept investing Hassan and Hussein as their grandparents. Children are responsible for their own business, if the son cannot prove assets; the responsible parents cannot come on.
Justice Ejaz Afzal inquired that yesterday was asked whether rival evidence was ready to give up.
Salman Akram said in an arguments that no one can say by Qatri, Queue’s video link was not offered, Justice Ejaz Al-Ahsan said that the trial court is not to accept evidence. Prime Minister’s child’s lawyer Salman Akram Raja has completed his arguments; Justice Azmat Saeed said today you gave good arguments. Justice Ejaz Afzal said that yesterday was asked whether rival evidence was ready to give up. Salman Akram Raja said that he could not say anything from Riyadh. Justice Ejaz Afzal inquired that what would happen if the income of the public office is not in accordance with the assets. The question is that the public office holder said in the assembly that these sources from which the buyers bought the flats, then Prime Minister gave some suspicious documents to the speaker; we have been waiting for these documents for a year.
Finance Minister Ishaq Dar’s lawyer Tariq Hassan presented a 34-year-old record in Ishaq Dar, which Justice Ejaz Al-Ahsan questioned that this is a big tax record for us? This will keep the TV all day long. Justice Azmat Saeed gave remarks to me how was it cleared by security personnel?
Tariq Hassan said that the JIT has also submitted such a case on which Justice Azmat gave remarks, are you also following JIT? Ishaq Dar’s lawyer Tariq Hassan argued that the court had faced difficult questions, filed two answers to the court, tried to remove judicial reservations in his reply.
Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan asked how Isaac Dar’s wealth in the last five years was 9 million to 837 million. Ishaq Dar did not give any documents except 3 posts in Sheikh Niyyan, what were the terms of employment?
Tariq Hassan adopted the stand that I do not know what papers are available, JIT does not ask for such a thing.
Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that it was your job to wrap logical documents on which the lawyer of Ishaq Dar ruled that JIT did not have a record, how to take the results? Justice Azmat Saeed responded to Tariq Hassan that how many times we will not decide on the results of JIT. Tariq Hassan stressed that there is no case against Ishaq Dar or evidence, when the record was given to JIT, it was not encouraged, Ishaq Dar has also shown its foreign income in banks; Ishaq Dar offered an auditing from the International Auditor.
Justice Ejaz Afzal gave the remarks, do you want this case to run and never end? One of your points was that JIT exceeded the mandate, Even if one acknowledged the Hadithibia case being removed, there is enough material against Ishaq Dar, in fact, you could not satisfy JIT on the increase in assets, it could also be the cause of a new legal complaint against you.
Finance Minister Ishaq Dar’s lawyer Tariq Hassan adopted the stand that Ishaq Dar has tired of crying his scrooney, this series should be closed, it is not acceptable to drag it into accountability court. The bench of the bench, Justice Ejaz Afzal, said, “Your stand is that the Hadithibs Mills cannot be opened again. You say it’s a dramatic story that ends as a drama? All the written materials will be reviewed.
Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that the son of Ishaq Dar provided the Hill Metal on which Tariq Hassan gave the arguments. That was the only transaction of this type of nature, as Ishaq Dar in JIT, as witness as a witness, seems to be the accused.
Justice Ejaz Al-Ahsan remarked that Ishaq Dar asks for the privilege in JIT, and does not understand what the privilege was being asked for?
Tariq Hassan adopted the stand that how Ishaq Dar was guilty of this transaction, he did not hide anything from JIT. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that you did not give JIT any documentary evidence to Sheikh Al-Nahin, do not you know that there should be any proof of assets growth? Tariq Hassan argued that Ishaq Dar had provided tax records to JIT; JIT should have been included in the documentation records submitted by Ishaq Dar. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that Ali Dar gave a gift to father Ishaq Dar, According to JIT, Ishaq Dar did not pay tax on this amount, and it is surprising to increase the 800 million in Ishaq Dar’s assets in 5 years.
Tehreek-e-Insaf’s lawyer Naeem Bukhari said in a reply to the court that Nawaz Sharif did not show the FZE Company, Prime Minister is not honest and honest in front of the nation. Nawaz Sharif also hailed to be a work permit and chairman, Nawaz Nawaz also concealed the receipts of salaries, The court said on the other hand, the salary was never taken? Naeem Bukhari replied that there are documents available for salary.
The bench of the bench, Justice Ejaz Afzal, inquired if the Act of Public Representation Act would not be taken to the Election Commission. Is it in the scope of the Supreme Court? Naeem Bukhari said even after the election the FZE Company was not shown, it does not appear to be in Article 62 and 63 categories. Naeem Bukhari said children were young at the time of purchasing London flats. Nawaz Sharif’s children had no means of income. Hussain Nawaz gave gifts of Nawaz Sharif to more than one billion rupees. The PTI lawyer said that all the money was received by Nawaz Sharif. Tax is applied on the amount received by Hill Metal; it is incredible that 88 percent of Hill Metal’s profit was found.
