Supreme Court of Pakistan ordered on immediate construction of Bhasha and Mohmand Dam
Islamabad … News Time
Supreme Court of Pakistan ordering immediate construction of Bhasha and Mohmand Dam the Federal Government has demanded a report in three weeks. Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar in Supreme Court hearing the case of dam building in which the court heard a brief decision on the construction of dams. The Supreme Court ordered the Federal Government to instantly build Bhasha and Mohmand Dam that the government should report about launching dams in 3 weeks and to build the dams, the name of the Supreme Court registrar is also opened. The Supreme Court also requested the nation to submit this account for the construction of dams.
Earlier during the hearing, during the briefing of former chairman WAPDA Shams-ul-Mulk that has become more than 46 thousand dams worldwide, India made 4,500 dams and China made 22 dams while World Bank and Canada did not help, there would not have been a dam in Pakistan. He said that there is a severe deficit in the dams in Pakistan and the immediate work should begin on the construction of dams. During the hearing, the Chief Justice gave remarks that Pakistan faced water scarcity, without water, the country’s survival will be difficult; the crisis will become intense if the problem of water is not resolved on the basis of war. Therefore, construction of Bhasha and Mohmand Dam should be started immediately while kalabagh dam is a lot of people, all agree if kalabagh dam can become too.
Water and power officials told the court that since 2001 the availability of water is gradually decreasing, this year the availability of water is very low compared to previous years, after Tarbella we should have made a new dam every 10 years later, we have the ability to store 13.7 million acres of water, our storage will increase from Bhasha and Mohmand Dam. The Chief Justice said that Pakistan needs dams; the dams that are made under the need of Pakistan are less, the underground water is owned by the state and we have given free water of Khabar Rupees whereas the dams are to be made, These are very important for the survival of the country, we have to unite the country, not divide, therefore, currently not talking of kalabagh dam, Sindh may call Kalabagh Dam in the future, currently, there are no controversies on the stocks that are fox.
Indian plans are on its own to deliver water to the floods of water the work that India’s leadership can not do in 70 years is recited to Modi he is making a dam on Pakistani rivers, changing rivers but there is no thought in Pakistan. The decision made by the Supreme Court to make the decision to make the dam was 64 years later. I was present in the courtroom court after the judicial verdict said some lawyer Kalabagh dam will be more delayed after this decision but to think that something like money was put on the orange line train. If they became a dam, all the people would have been beneficial. Of course, its punishment goes to court and head or else everyone has kept this matter on the other.
Chairman of WAPDA said that my hands were tied, but they did not want to explain to me. The Finance Ministry was planning on planning and ministry water the secretary of the Planning Division sitting on my side and other senior officers remained silent watching the court’s mode otherwise talking to the court to be told that this dam is controversial because the approval of his case was not taken over in episodes and instead of Sindh Chief Minister, his beloved relative has signed as finance minister Etc. etc. which shows that bureaucrats know their duty to withdraw national affairs and national plans, to remove insects from them. So that they can be believed that they are also bureaucrats and officers while their own generations will be suffering from the coming punishment due to lack of dam but they seem to rise in the future of the future.
Water is closest to the largest criminal blasphemy and negligence of Satluj, Ravi and Beas. According to the clause of the agreement which India can not do according to the Indus Water Treaty, Water supply for the people is water supply and wild life but the department of Pakistan whose responsibility is to be monitored. He gave an open waiver to his head that he would also deal with India. Pakistan has allegedly become a Canadian citizen after the Indian Water Commissioner retirement and its property there is no less than a Saudi princess. Where did this wealth come from, he did not make this wealth legally? And if he was a Patriot of Pakistan, the rest of his life spent in Pakistan but whose heart is a thief, why would he like to stay in Pakistan, in this case some other officers will also be involved. India, by submitting the Indus Water Treaty to Pakistan, fulfills its kind of activities by giving them huge amounts to the completion. The action against these individuals is the work of accountability agencies, but the experts put all the imports on such technical techniques that are not easy to catch.
Indus water treaty is separate and unique; about Chief Editor News Zia Shahid’s petition hearing in Supreme Court today the hearing was held that could not be done the case of Indus Water Treaty is different from the dams in Pakistan. These separate talks include some treacherous homeland to sabotage these dams. The nation’s water was sold and the property was acquired by the name of its daughters, sons, and foreign citizenship. In the last 7, 5 years, political ambassadors were deployed in the United States and Britain there is evidence to get illegal deposits from the embassies responsible for them but the British citizen posted in the UK was in a view of the Pakistani diplomat while the case of Husain Haqqani, posted in the United States, is seen from the other hand although both cases are the same, pictures of transferring documents of National Accountability Bureau in Switzerland are still on the Net, which were overseen by Britain and Pakistan. But he declared his presence there an accident that he was putting a canopy container in the rain.
If Pakistan still did not take any step in closing the water of Satluj, Ravi and Beas so it will be closed forever, as per the clause of this agreement, it must be decided by means of intermediation. And if the arbitrator tells me that the parties do not obey my mediation, then the matter will go to the International Court the arbitrator of Pakistan has set up a new dam from Neelum, India on the Jhelum River, Power plant is about to plant and reduce water. There is no mention of the closure of the water of Satlaj, Satluj, Ravi and Beas. This is a serious matter which is not taken noticeably when India and its institutions can be able to provide more service to the officers of Pakistan and to give them a glimpse. After which we will not have any chance. If the future taken this matter in court or in mediation in the future, India will objectively object to it that Pakistan has not engaged in this matter in the first arbitration and has not been under consideration, it is thought to be an impartiality of its later.
In 1960, Indus Water Treaty, between India and India, contains several articles which are clearly mentioned that India will not completely stop water in these rivers to maintain the environment. It is not even less than any surprise those government agencies and officers prepare PCCs to take the right from India. It is then approved that months apply, and then every institution extracts insects and so India gets time. In some cases, Pakistan loses itself due to its shortcomings and delay. Provincial Commissioner of Sindh Water in an interview said in an interview that India’s interests have been monitored by the people posted in the Water Commission. We should be instantly attracted to such cases immediately.
