Tensions between Pakistan and India are on the rise in South Asia’s two largest countries
News Time
Tensions between Pakistan and India are on the rise, with several major and meaningful visits taking place in South Asia. Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan’s visit is deeply ingrained in him. As Tayyab Erdogan was returning home, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres was coming to Pakistan. During the visits of the Turkish President and the UN Secretary General, relations between Pakistan and India and Kashmir were discussed in some way. The third important visit to the region is the arrival of US President Donald Trump to India. US President Donald Trump is visiting India this month on 24, 25. He will visit Modi’s home state of Gujarat besides Delhi. Trump will sign a number of bilateral trade and defense agreements in the meantime. India does not have new agreements India is currently the closest ally and friend of the Strategic Partnership with the US. And before that, only Israel had this status.
Donald Trump’s visit to South Asian politics is also of great importance. India and Pakistan stand at the threshold of regular war, two of South Asia’s most important countries. Tensions and conflicts between the two have been going on for a long time, but after the end of Kashmir’s special identity on August 5, the tension has taken a new and frightening turn. The remaining diplomatic and trade links between Pakistan and India have worsened. The Line of Control is completely hot and bloodshed is on the line every day. Kashmir is at a standstill between the two countries. India wants to justify its unpopular and illegal actions in Kashmir around the world. That is why she is on her way to change every scenario from America to Europe.
After August 5, Pakistan faced the situation with patience and endurance. The step of August 5 was a violation of international law as well as bilateral agreements between Pakistan and India. Pakistan expects world powers to play a meaningful role in reverse the situation in occupied Kashmir and India’s decisions. That is why Prime Minister Imran Khan has repeatedly offered Donald Trump mediation on Kashmir issue. And Trump has also accepted the mediation offer, but the other party is the absolute opposite of including a third party in the name of mediation and facilitation. And India has repeatedly rejected Trump’s offer to mediate. Even so, Trump’s Anna is injured and neither complains in his language. Denial of Arbitration although not abusive, it declares not recognizing America’s global role. If this denial was from Pakistan, the anger of the United States would have been worth watching but this process by India is a routine operation for the United States.
Now, what is the attitude of Donald Trump visiting India? The future of South Asia depends too. If Trump spends two days in the throes of Narendra Modi and hosting a rally, it should be understood that the future of South Asia will continue to hang on the cross of tensions. On the contrary, Trump spoke on Kashmir, the basis of India-Pakistan tension. And pressing India to move forward in this regard would be a good omen for the future of the region. If the frustration of Kashmiris increases with the international community, the people of occupied Kashmir, Azad Kashmir and Pakistan will start looking for a new route, regardless of the governments. In order to prevent a new phase of tension and to keep the youth from falling into a swamp of despair, progress towards a meaningful solution to Kashmir is essential. In this regard, Donald Trump’s visit to India is a barometer of the region’s politics and future. Trump can also restrict the possibility of peace by putting his weight on Narendra Modi’s bed and a balanced and realistic approach can also play an important role in increasing the prospects for peace and giving hope.
The visit of UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was also three-day. Addressing an environmental seminar in Islamabad on the first day of his visit, he said that human rights in Kashmir are essential and they support dialogue between Pakistan and India. Pakistan and India must resolve the issues through dialogue. Tayyip Erdogan had said something similar on the issue of Kashmir in Islamabad. He said the issue should be resolved on the principle of justice rather than power. India became enraged at Tayyip Erdogan’s suggestion and advised Turkey to refrain from interfering in India’s internal affairs. Now when the head of the world’s largest global chamber talks about resolving the Kashmir issue, India’s stance on internal affairs proved to be absolutely false. India’s head of the international organization, Antonio Gutters, is referring to the problem as India, calling it an internal matter. The question is, how long will India continue to try to hide the sun behind its finger?
In reply to a question from US Senator Lindsey Graham, Indian Foreign Minister J Shankar (Subrahmanyam Jaishankarr) had developed the theory. And in response to the two countries jointly resolving the issue, he had said in a lively manner that you do not worry that the same democracy will solve India. India has spent years trying to solve this problem, but failure is the destiny. Even today, the condition of 9 lakh troops in the streets of Kashmir is nothing short of a failure to see the battle. This arrogance of India is hollowing it from the inside and its hardship is wreaking havoc. India has created a lot of Kashmir within its own existence by suppressing the slogans of freedom in Kashmir today and the slogans of freedom are starting to rise in the cities of India.
The lieutenants of the UN Secretary General, Tayyab Erdogan and the US Senator are all symbols and expressions of India’s pride. India has to bear the brunt of its behavior. Ask any Indians why Kashmir is their internal problem? If this was an internal issue, why did India’s first Prime Minister, Pandit Nehru, go to the United Nations to organize a reunion? Why was it part of all the UN action since then? Why go away why did India allow Kashmiris to travel without a visa passport on the Line of Control during General Musharraf’s time and why there were track-to-talks talks during that time? The rulers of India have nothing but power to answer these questions, but power is a big fact but not everything.
