JIT’s forth hearing
Islamabad … News Time
During the hearing of the Panama Paper Processing case in the Supreme Court, Justice Azmat Saeed remarked that not to attack the JIT but answer his documents, and the case of fake documents has broken my heart.
In front of us, we have to provide fake documents in the case, but currently do not want to go ahead.
The three-member bench of the Supreme Court today hearing the fourth hearing after submitting a joint investigation team (JIT) report to investigate the Panama case. In which Prime Minister’s children’s lawyer Salman Akram Raja gave the arguments, after which the court adjourned further hearing, but Salman Akram Raja will also argue tomorrow.
Justice Azmat Saeed during the hearing said that in case we have to provide counterfeit documents, we do not want to go ahead of the issue. What happens if fake documents are present in the court?
Additional Attorney General told the court that the case is lodged to submit fake documents.
Justice Ejaz Al-Ahsan said that there is a 7-year sentence for submitting fake documents. Justice Azmat Saeed said that Raja Sahib, what did you do this? We cannot even imagine that, how did you go? Justice Ejaz Al-Ahsan asked Salman Akram Raja, the Prime Minister’s children’s lawyer that there was a holiday in the UK on February 4, 2006, and no one can take any phone in the UK on vacation. What do you have to answer?
Salman Akram Raja said it could have been a mistake.
Justice Azmat said that your government thinks Dubai government does so many mistakes, how can such eyes be closed?
Salman Akram Raja, the lawyer of the Prime Minister’s children, said that senior lawyer Akram Sheikh was running the case at this time; the matter would be given to the relevant forum.
Justice Azmat Saeed said that no one wants to affect the basic rights of anyone; it will not say anything which affects the case. Justice Azmat Saeed said that you want us to not believe in the coming-day document.
Salman Akram Raja said that our position has further investigated. During hearing, Salman Akram Raja, Prime Minister’s children’s lawyer, argued that the UAE officials responded not to the record of Gulf Mills’s agreement, The transit of 12 million Durham transactions also, JIT results on a UAE letter, no question was asked from Hussain Nawaz on the letter.
Justice Ejaz Afzal gave remarks that the Prime Minister bought London flats, children were young; the applicant says where did the Prime Minister come from? If proves that the flats themselves are purchased themselves, your clients and public office holders will be saved, it does not prove to be a public office holder. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said that our question about Mini Trail is still in place. Justice Azmat Saeed said, “Where does the money come from?”
Salman Akram Raja submitted a complaint to the JIT report in the Supreme Court, which has been requested to reject the report and evidence.
Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan gave remarks when the question is taken. Justice Majmat Saeed said that in private documents, it can also be written that goods went to the tie tank, bring a certified document. Do not attack JIT results, answer their documents. The fourth hearing of the Panama execution case on the JIT report in the Supreme Court has been headed by Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan,
Salman Akram Raja is giving arguments to the Prime Minister’s children’s lawyer. Salman Akram Raja, Prime Minister’s Children’s Law, submit the courtesy of London Flats’ documents in the court.
At the beginning of the hearing, Justice Azmat remarked that Salman Sahib presented his case in front of the media. All the documents are discussed in the media, outside the media diameter, there are also arguments. Both documents will be opened in court.
During the hearing, Salman Akram Raja adopted the stand that the JIT took a look at the UAE letter; No question was asked to ask Hussain Nawaz on the UAE letter, as well as certified documents of Hussain Nawaz. On which Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan questioned that Hussain Nawaz’s documents were requested from the UAE.
On which Salman Akram said that in the letter the customs record of transport of machinery is also not available, 12 million Durham transactions were also denied, UAE officials responded not to the record of Gulf Mills’s agreement.
Justice Azmat Saeed said that UAE authorities had said that this seal is not ours, the effect that the seal does not confirm is not to bring the court proceedings. Salman Akram Raja said that nothing would happen; something went wrong, it was wrong.
Justice Ejaz Al-Ahsan said that Hussain Nawaz and Tariq Shafi asked him, “We did not comment,” he said. He said he did not know this notary seal, This means that the documents are incorrect, was asked that Hussain Nawaz confirmed the Notary Public? Hussein Nawaz told JIT that he did not go to Dubai, who confirmed the Notary Public? So this document seems to be fake.
On the query of the court, Salman Akram Raja adopted the stand that Hussein Nawaz went to confirm any further notice.
Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan told Salman Akram Raja that we are asking you to explain your position on which he said that JIT did not comply with Hussain Nawaz, JIT did wrong question. Justice Ejaz remarked that the Dubai authorities called the Notary Public as false and fake, On May 12, 1988, Dubai authorities declared fake May 30, 2016. On this, Salman Akram Raja said that UAE officials will have a serious mistake. Justice Ejaz Afzal said that now you have brought new documents, will see the impact on their case, all the records you should have provided to the JIT, on which Salman Akram said that JIT has declared all my documents fake. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said Dubai authorities refused to go to Scrap Jeddah from Dubai on which Salman Akram said it was not a scrap machine.
Justice Ejaz said when the machine went to Abbasi from Dubai; it should have a record on which Salman Akram stressed that the machinery went to Dubai by Abu Dubai. Justice Ejaz said that now the machinery was jailed with Abu Dubai, you first adopted the position that the machinery had been shifted to Dubai. On which Salman Akram said that the movement of goods inside the UAE does not record the movement.
Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said when the question is taken, the documents bring. Justice Azmat Saeed said that bring a certified document, the documents you are showing are private, In private documents, it can also be written that the goods went to the tie tank, give documents to the customs authorities, customs codes are downloaded from the internet.
Salman Akram Raja said that coding has been written in packing, where Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan questioned where the packing list is in the document? Salman Akram did not express doubt about the transfer of stand-alone machinery earlier.
Justice Ejaz Afzal, head of the bench, said that this document was brought to the notice of this document. Justice Azmat Saeed said that do not attack JIT results, answer their documents on which Salman Akram Raja said in the arguments that Azizi Steel Mill’s bank record is also available. Justice Ejaz al-Ahsan asked if there was any survival on Azizi Mill at the time of sale, in which Salman Akram said that those who had survived Azizi Mill were paid. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan told the Prime Minister’s children that he was requested to confirm the request of Hussain Nawaz’s documents.
On which Salman Akram Raja read the letter of UAE’s Ministry of Justice, Salman Akram Raja said that there was no question of Hussain Nawaz on the UAE letter. The authentic documents of Hussain Nawaz were also not considered, JIT results in the UAE letter.
Justice Ejaz Afzal said that some documents have been received in the name of JIT. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan said a documentary princess is related to a British Virgin Islands. Salman Akram Raja Akram Raja explained that the media did not give documents to me. Justice Azmat Saeed said that all the documents will be given to the media team.
Salman Akram Raja argued that the JIT took a look at the UAE letter, On the UAE letter, Hussain Nawaz did not ask any question, the documents of Hussain Nawaz were not even considered.
Justice Ejaz Al-Ahsan remarked that what is in the letter letter does not know, JIT sent documents for confirmation for that reason, Maryam’s lawyer showed the courtesy of Narva’s documents in court, but also requested the request of Hussain Nawaz’s documents from the UAE.
The Prime Minister’s children said that the letter said that the customs record of transfer of machinery is not available, but 12 million Durham transactions were also denied, UAE officials refused to record the record of Gulf Mills’s agreement. Given. Earlier, Salman Akram Raja had said that these papers were already present on the occasion of arrival of Supreme Court. JIT ignored, there were documents, but they said that they did not exist. On the question of a journalist, is there an answer to the questions asked by the court? He said today you will hear arguments. Justice Ejaz Al Ahsan asked the lawyer of the prime minister if there were any survival on Azizi Mill at the time of sale? In reply, Salman Akram Raja said that the money bank was available at Azizi Mill, which was paid out. Salman Akram Raja also filed objections on the JIT report by the Supreme Court. The Prime Minister’s children’s lawyer submitted 17-page objections and argued that the court should reject the JIT report and evidence.
