Hafiz Saeed, head of banned Jamaat-ud-Dawa in Pakistan
Lahore … News Time
Hafiz Saeed has been sentenced to 11 years in prison for fundraising and money laundering. According to details, Judge Arshad Hussain Bhatta, Judge Arshad Hussain Bhatta of the Anti-Terrorism Court Number One, has handed down the verdict in two cases in connection with Hafiz Saeed. According to the report, Hafiz Saeed has been sentenced to five and a half years in prison for fundraising and money laundering. Hafiz Saeed, the head of the banned Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief in Pakistan, has been sentenced to 11 years in total by the Lahore Anti-Terrorism Court in two cases. According to a Voice of America report, the Lahore Anti-Terrorism Court sentenced the banned Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief to Hafiz Saeed for 11 years in total and 11,000 rupees in two separate cases.
Punjab Anti-Terrorism Department launches big crackdown against banned outfits involved in terrorism so, in connection with terrorist financing, five outlawed organizations in Lahore, Gujranwala and Multan were registered under the Terrorism Act. These organizations include the Dawaat-ul-Irshad Trust, the Ma’ad Bin Jabal Trust, the Al-Anfaal Trust, the Al-Madina Foundation Trust, and the Al-Madina Foundation Trust (Al-Anfaal Trust). Hamd Trust) Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, Abdul Rehman Makki, Amir Hamza, Mohammad Yahya Aziz were nominated in the cases. On July 1, the government filed cases against Hafiz Saeed and six other associates for being the head of the Lashkar-e-Taiba and involved in terrorism. They have been accused of promoting terrorism and raising funds to finance terrorists.
It is to be noted that the Special Anti-Terrorism Court on Saturday adjourned the decision on the case related to financing terrorism. And it was decided that on February 11, after hearing all the defense defense cases, the decision was decided to hear the stand. In the petition, the lawyer of the accused had requested that a comprehensive verdict be made after the completion of the trials of all the pending cases. Prosecutor opposes plea stance that cases for which hearing has been completed the court can hear its verdict, but the court postponed the verdict and sought the two parties’ stand on the petition.
