The social context of Asia Christ Case

Issues of Configuring Asia's Trade Agreement with the European Union in the GSP Plus is subject to release of the release of Asia Christ.

Issues of Configuring Asia’s Trade Agreement with the European Union in the GSP Plus is subject to release of the release of Asia Christ.

News Time

Muneeb-ur-Rahman has appealed to the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of the Asia Christ case, a hearing hearing on the court’s decision should be started and a full bench should be established for it. Asia Christ’s requirement is correct and our request is that the court should take serious and immediate attention to it. While it is also appropriate to assume some other related issues along with it. We think this decision is a matter of attention in three references. One is that since the European Union, especially for the European Union, it is demanding that the release of Asia Christ. It is not going to be a secret press, but as a formal and on-demand demand even in January this year, EU’s representative came to Islamabad and told the government of Pakistan. The issue of the agreement with the EU to confuse Pakistan’s involvement in the GSP Plus trade agreement is the release of Asia Christ, and with that, he blamed Pakistan’s Supreme Court for deliberately delaying it. A EU visit to Islamabad, a English newspaper report in Islamabad, can be seen on January 22, 2018. The other aspect of this problem is that the scholars and religious workers of the people and especially all intellectuals throughout Pakistan have expressed displeasure on this decision. And it has also declared hypocrisy as well as national autonomy requirements. While its third aspect is legal and court which has made the basis of its decision and it is said that since the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the country’s legal and judicial matters is the Supreme Court of Pakistan. Therefore, the decision he has made is the last and there is no need for revision.

We believe that Asia Christ needs to see the case in all three scope and ignoring any of these aspects will not be according to the requirements of justice. As far as external pressures are present and open openness of feelings of Pakistani people is concerned there is no need to argue on it, everything is in front of the eyes and everyone is looking. However there is a debate on legal aspects of the matter, there are also legally valid respondents. And those who are not legally correct, this decision is not even less, the arguments are both sides and they are also expressing. However, this discussion is surprised on all the behavior that when a problem is intended to discuss discussion and its various aspects of self-analysis and research are needed by this matter itself so arguments and arguments on both sides should come out, what is the need to worry about it? Based on the narration of Hanafi, consultation and dialogue is that Hazrat Imam Azam Abu Hanifa presented a problem in a large gathering of scholars, it was discussed, every standpoint arguments were brought, and then there was no opinion about this problem. Abu Jafar Tahaawi is considered as a great poet and spokesperson of Jihad Hanifa, their goal is that they offer all the facts together on a problem, the arguments of everyone bring out and explain their position after the discussion. In addition to the discussion of Hanifa-speaking and Abu Jafar Tahaawi’s narrative-based educational curriculum, readers who read this regular study and it is a surprise that the fact that when someone starts discussing someone’s discussion against his position, in this context, we would like to request the friends who discuss the legal aspects of the Asia Christ case it is inevitable to see that case by legal reference but it is also important to keep in front of external pressure and other aspects of public emotions, and it is not correct to say that since the judgment was appropriate in the light of legal requirements in court.

Advertisement

No comments.

Leave a Reply