Risk to Indus Wate Treaty

 Controversial Kishanganga Dam

Controversial Kishanganga Dam

News Time

Failure to resolve the related issues of Kishanganga Hydro Project is currently displayed when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated Kishanganga Hydroelectric Plant in occupied Kashmir on May 19, 2018. Shortly after the inaugural ceremony, Pakistani authorities knocked at the World Bank’s door and India recorded protest against the inauguration of the project without solving physical issues related to restrictions on the lower level Spillwayas and plant operations. The World Bank revoked the matter for the appointment of chairman’s appointment arbitration court. Pakistan had begun to resolve the issue in arbitration court, while India had applied for the appointment of a neutral expert in December 2016. The World Bank exchanged the matter for the apparent protection of the Indus Wate Treaty in the interest of the two countries. Apart from this, the World Institute’s view was also to give India and Pakistan an opportunity to set up the Kishanganga-related issue. But India benefited from getting the issue far away and completed the project without making changes on the design, which broke out further. Generally it is found to be a false impression that the bank is the guaranteed or guaranteed guarantee, but this impression is not correct because there is no defined role related to the bank’s contract. Its role is limited. Apart from the appointment of a neutral expert, he performs the duty of establishing a mediation court and the appointment of his chairman. This World Bank role is set only when both countries and parties can not reach any agreement. Both countries suggested different types of solutions to resolve this conflict. In this case, the fact that this type of question has already been discussed and the mediation court has ratified it in the Kishanganga partial award.

India’s position is based on just cheating and wandering. India could not offer any concrete arguments to the issues which Pakistan mentioned as regards the use of the vehicle. He never refuses and confesses. She is always happy to present her position with words. Indian officials say that technical issues come under the scope of a neutral expert at the level of permanent commission of Indian Commission. According to India, the Kishanganga project is fully compatible with the affairs and matters specified in the project. Some artistic issues arbitrary notable in the arbitration court because such matters can only be neutralist. In the partial award, the court has declared that the commission has been constantly expressing that there is no difference between the two parties. Therefore, India cans no longer claim that the dispute is of course a controversial nature. The tension in both the relations between the two countries has been observed while preparing the draft of the agreement, therefore the emphasis on the agreement has been emphasized that the interpretation of the agreement will now be resolved with the passion of cooperation. There is a comprehensive framework in the agreement for this purpose in order to achieve the purpose of non-consensus related issues. The mechanism of conflict and settlement during the contract was discussed in detail.

After reviewing this whole situation, it comes to the fact that the arbitration court can review the nature of questions and there is no restriction. The application of a neutral expert by India was done in the last stages. At the time, the process of establishing a mediation court was overwhelmed. This application of India can be termed as harm to all the processes through the barrier of procedure. The article of the Agreement IX (1) explicitly expresses that through the creation of a mediation court, any interpretation of the agreement or any application related to the application can be reviewed. The World Bank has a definite role, but in its specific case, its Conduct Agreement can be described as a threat to the threat. Furthermore, for 18 months, there is no reason to hang or push one case. During this period of any kind of promise, India was not promised that it would stop working on the project until it was resolved.

The Kishanganga Project / river Neelum is a matter of prevention of 23 to 24 km long tunnel. Pakistan can get this water after passing the control line at Chakkoti. Although the quantity of water flow is badly affected during the process but by turning River Neelum’s water, other than the environment, the people of the valley Neelum were severely impressed. The valley of the valley depends on the river which will no longer be able to play a role in its sustainable economic evolution. Due to this natural wastage, there will be no parallel bay and deep. Poverty-eradication plans will be affected and disputes will increase. There are reports that indicate that doubts of the control line are also doubts and doubts. Because 88% of electricity generated from Kishanganga will be included in the National Grid.

Indian experts do not consider this project economically appropriate, but Kishanganga is India’s new strategicic project because of this, India will get its legal occupation on the territory and its domination will increase on the resources of Jammu and Kashmir. What is the purpose of this project and how are the moral principles of this objective, India is bound to be under international law? That he designs the design and planning of his plans in a manner that does not harm Pakistan’s interests.

Pakistan can be considered responsible for timely action, but it can not be accused of indirectly responding to water reservoirs in large quantities of water through Indian dams. With this process of India, tension is increasing in two countries’ relations. For external steak holders, it is necessary that they make concrete and fast efforts to engage the two countries together on the path of cooperation. The objectives and goals mentioned in the Department of Indus Wate Treaty have been important to express concrete commitment to both sides. The changing colors and water shortages of climate can lead to the danger of social and economic evolution through the people of the two countries.

Nature’s forces are now forced to make both neighbors feel that they need to work together for peace. Only then the change of the environment can be avoided by the destruction. The bank is considered to be a liar behavior. It has won seventh status by voting power in World Bank institutions. With the United States in the global institutions, India has political influence on policy and decision-making. America has the status of number one in the vote. However, the bank should think about personal affiliations with political mail reconciliation and its broader business interests. And there should be any solution to eliminate this situation. If this is not done, the world institutions will not be missed out of good words to leave unauthorized heritage. The government is not a league attempt on the Kishanganga arbitration process related.


No comments.

Leave a Reply